Thursday, September 24, 2009

TBI AND INCARCERATION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a form of acquired brain injury, occurs when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain. TBI can result when the head suddenly and violently hits an object, or when an object pierces the skull and enters brain tissue. Symptoms of a TBI can be mild, moderate, or severe, depending on the extent of the damage to the brain. A person with a mild TBI may remain conscious or may experience a loss of consciousness for a few seconds or minutes. Other symptoms of mild TBI include headache, confusion, lightheadedness, dizziness, blurred vision or tired eyes, ringing in the ears, bad taste in the mouth, fatigue or lethargy, a change in sleep patterns, behavioral or mood changes, and trouble with memory, concentration, attention, or thinking. (http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/tbi/tbi.htm)


Research has shown that there is an alarmingly high prevalence of inmates with TBI. According to an article we found on braininjury.org.au, “People with acquired brain injury remain the forgotten group in the criminal justice system. Indeed it seems that brain trauma is so common among the prison population that it is not considered outside the ordinary or subject to particular attention.” Some say that more thorough screening is necessary to ensure that inmates are incarcerated for the right reasons.


The opposing viewpoint is that since these individuals with TBI are more often than not involved in substance abuse, domestic violence, and other crimes that prison is the right place for them.


Do you think that Traumatic Brain Injury is sometimes the cause of incarceration? Why? Do you think different screening procedures should be instituted before incarceration?


Take a look at these articles for more information regarding this critical issue.


http://braininjury.org.au/portal/statistics/prison---our-best-treatment-for-acquired-brain-injury---fact-sheet.html


http://traumaticbraininjury.net/wordpress/?p=342

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Autism and Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)

Applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapy teaches children with autism appropriate social behaviors they may not be able to acquire otherwise. The observer identifies what "triggers" inappropriate behavior, what reinforces that behavior, and then teaches the child an appropriate replacement behavior that serves the same purpose.

However, some believe that ABA does more than harm than good. Their argument is that the therapy teaches people with autism to mimic typical behavior with no understanding of it and suppresses natural behavior. The practice is barbaric, causing post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression later in life. Michelle Dawson, a person with autism, elaborates in this article (read "Ethical challenges to behavior analysis" section).

Dr. Michael Morrier of Emory University's Autism Center explains ABA here.

This website provides more information on ABA therapy.

In your opinion, is ABA an effective therapy for children with autism? Why or why not?

-Britany Barnes, Shelly Peterson, Lauren Stevenson, Cassie Stoneman, Mike Thomas

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Vaccination Controversy

Through our personal study we have found that researchers’ perspectives on the causes of autism are not linked to MMR vaccinations, which fight against measles, mumps, and rubella. Their perspective is backed by many current case studies and research. However, many parents with autistic children claim that vaccinations can be the cause of their child’s autism. They have seen first hand the behavior changes in their children, close to the times of their vaccinations.

Watch this video of a mother’s viewpoint on this issue
http://www.wral.com/news/political/video/4528997/
Here is an article on the researchers’ point of view
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/03/AR2008090303396.html

Do you agree with current researchers’ perspectives indicating that vaccinations do not cause autism, or do you agree with some parents’ viewpoints that it does? What is your opinion? Why?

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Is a technocentric approach inadequate?

In the article Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed, Harris, Mishra, and Koehlher make a case for why a technocentric (bottom of page 3) approach to technology integration is inadequate.  Explain what you think that they mean and whether you agree or disagree and why.  Your response requires you to understand their main argument and why the TPCK framework supports their argument.  Your response should be approximately 150 words (give or take.  I will not be counting the words but this will give you an idea of how in depth I want your response)